p. 93−99
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 100−107
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 108−115
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 116−121
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 122−125
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 126−133
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 134−138
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 139−143
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 144−149
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 150−154
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 155−159
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 160−165
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 166−172
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 173−179
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
30 year group respectively. Mean CPTIN was 0.715, 0.696, 0.827 and 0.784 for the 3rd,4 th, 5th and 6 th grade dental students respectively.
Conclusion
Periodontal status was more satisfactory among females, and among the 4 th grade students followed by 3 rd grade students. Treatment needs were generally low. Maxilla was less affected than mandible . Gingivitis was the most prevalent involvement .]]>
p. 180−184
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4
p. 185−188
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 3,4