p. 93−98
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
0.05).As age increased, the prevalence of pulp stones increased (P=0.025). Frequency of stone in maxilla was 56% and in mandible was 9% and the difference was significant (P=0.0001). The highest prevalence of pulp stones was in first molars of maxilla. The prevalence of pulp stone was significantly higher in sound teeth (P=0.0001).
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate that pulp stone is a frequent finding in molars and sound teeth and increases significantly with age. There is no significant association between pulp stone and gender or systemic disease.]]>
p. 99−106
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 107−118
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 119−128
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 129−138
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 139−148
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
0.05). Finally, among the three techniques implemented traditional method gained the highest score compared to the two other techniques. Conclusion: Traditional mothels seem to be the most suitable technique as compared to the other 2 mothels.]]>
p. 149−158
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 159−168
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 169−184
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2
p. 185−192
2008-2347
Vol.38/No.2