p. 7−10
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 11−16
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 17−24
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 25−30
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 31−36
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 37−42
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 43−48
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 49−56
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 57−66
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
12 yrs.), 2) 24 type II diabetic subjects (NIDDM, aged>40 yrs.), and 3) 10 non-diabetic patients of any age range. Clinical parameters included probing pocket depth, plaque index, Russle's Index as well as radiographic bone loss.
Results & conclusion: Statistical analysis of findings demonstrated that variation in periodontal indices among the 3 groups was mainly due to variation in the age of subjects. Type I diabetic subjects had a greater score for Russle's Index as compared to the other 2 groups even after adjustment for age. Diabetes duration was in positive correlation with the degree of periodontal destruction regardless of the diabetes type. Furthermore, fasting blood glucose level had a positive but insignificant correlation with various periodontal indices.]]>
p. 67−74
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 75−84
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2
p. 85−92
2008-2347
Vol.27/No.شماره 1,2